Anti-semites running the HRC? No!

The thing is, I consider it quite fascist to have Human Rights Commissions with the power to judge the palatability of my political speech, and take action against me if they find it not so.

I consider it fascist that the Canadian Jewish Congress has fought so hard to clamp down on free speech rights in this country, exposing all Canadian citizens to the long-term potential abuse by the state.  And we've already started to see this abuse happening, by the way.

I consider it fascist that Richard Warman has sought to have the HRC mandate the CRTC to setup a Great Firewall of Canada on the internet, where our government will have the power to filter specific international websites.  It's neo-nazi websites today, what will it be tomorrow?  International blogs that criticize Christianity, Judaism, or Islam, and in the interpretation of the HRC, is "likely to expose that group to contempt"?  No thanks.  I'd rather take my chances with freedom, than with fascism. 

And by the way, I don't demean the CJC. They demean themselves by this horrible stand they've taken on the issue.  

I cannot believe the Jewish people endured the horrors of fascism, in the unspeakable way they did, only to turn around and repeat those tendencies.  And by that, I'm not in any way suggesting a "moral equivalence" between the slaughter of millions of people and Human Rights Commissions.  So hold on to your outrage.  I'm not calling the CJC fascist, but I'm calling the HRCs fascist. I'm calling support for Section 13(1) fascist, though. Because, when it comes to the abridgment of basic human rights, good intentions are not good enough.  Anybody who wants to abridge my basic right to "free speech" is going to earn the label fascist in my book.  You can interpret that however you want.