Richard Warman has named Ezra Levant in a libel claim. Ezra is going to fight, but he's going to need both moral and financial support to see this through.
This time Mr. Warman will need to respond to evidence that seems to suggest he was planting evidence at websites he in turn prosecuted before the Canadian Human Rights Commission.
Warman, in official transcripts, appears to have contradicted himself under oath. More curiously, the Human Rights Tribunal seemingly obtained records from Rogers Communications, which were never disclosed, and the HRT simply tossed aside the whole issue as immaterial. Was it immaterial? If it was, then why weren't the records made public, or made available to the respondents in the case?
These are questions that Ezra will put to Warman in a real court of law.
Sarah and I have pledged some modest financial support for Ezra, and will continue to do so as we can afford it. If you can afford it, and these issues are important to you, then I hope you can donate too.
No, the Rogers records disappeared and were never seen by any of the parties to the argument. I've written on it, and Mark Fournier has said as much on FreeD (where I got my quote).
This time Mr. Warman will need to respond to evidence that seems to suggest he was planting evidence at websites he in turn prosecuted before the Canadian Human Rights Commission.
LeRant's lynch mob won't help him in libel court and the standard "but what about" defense will only dig a deeper hole for him.
Robert McClelland...
has an opinion anyone cares about?
New site, same old boorish trolls.